On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:36 AM, George Dunlap
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 05:43:33PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> For some reason the 'feof()' check for the file size isn't working in
>>> llvm-clang-fast mode; the result is several kil
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 05:43:33PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>> For some reason the 'feof()' check for the file size isn't working in
>> llvm-clang-fast mode; the result is several kilobyte files rather than
>> the 4k limit files as we've reques
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 05:43:33PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> For some reason the 'feof()' check for the file size isn't working in
> llvm-clang-fast mode; the result is several kilobyte files rather than
> the 4k limit files as we've requested. This is bad in part because
> AFL will spend time
On 25/08/17 17:43, George Dunlap wrote:
> For some reason the 'feof()' check for the file size isn't working in
> llvm-clang-fast mode; the result is several kilobyte files rather than
> the 4k limit files as we've requested. This is bad in part because
> AFL will spend time trying to "fuzz" bits
For some reason the 'feof()' check for the file size isn't working in
llvm-clang-fast mode; the result is several kilobyte files rather than
the 4k limit files as we've requested. This is bad in part because
AFL will spend time trying to "fuzz" bits of the input that are never
touched.
Add a new
