Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/16] SUPPORT.md: Add core ARM features

Hi George, On 11/21/2017 10:45 AM, George Dunlap wrote: On 11/21/2017 08:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote: +### ARM/SMMUv1 + +Status: Supported + +### ARM/SMMUv2 + +Status: Supported Do these belong here, when IOMMU isn't part of the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/16] SUPPORT.md: Add core ARM features

>>> On 21.11.17 at 13:39, wrote: > What about something like this? > > ### IOMMU > > Status, AMD IOMMU: Supported > Status, Intel VT-d: Supported > Status, ARM SMMUv1: Supported > Status, ARM SMMUv2: Supported Fine with me, as it makes things explicit.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/16] SUPPORT.md: Add core ARM features

On Nov 21, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Jan Beulich > wrote: On 21.11.17 at 11:45, > wrote: On 11/21/2017 08:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 13.11.17 at 16:41,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/16] SUPPORT.md: Add core ARM features

>>> On 21.11.17 at 11:45, wrote: > On 11/21/2017 08:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote: >>> +### ARM/SMMUv1 >>> + >>> +Status: Supported >>> + >>> +### ARM/SMMUv2 >>> + >>> +Status: Supported >> >> Do these

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/16] SUPPORT.md: Add core ARM features

On 11/21/2017 08:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote: >> +### ARM/SMMUv1 >> + >> +Status: Supported >> + >> +### ARM/SMMUv2 >> + >> +Status: Supported > > Do these belong here, when IOMMU isn't part of the corresponding > x86 patch? Since

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/16] SUPPORT.md: Add core ARM features

>>> On 13.11.17 at 16:41, wrote: > +### ARM/SMMUv1 > + > +Status: Supported > + > +### ARM/SMMUv2 > + > +Status: Supported Do these belong here, when IOMMU isn't part of the corresponding x86 patch? Jan ___

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/16] SUPPORT.md: Add core ARM features

Hardware support and guest type. Signed-off-by: George Dunlap --- CC: Ian Jackson CC: Wei Liu CC: Andrew Cooper CC: Jan Beulich CC: Stefano Stabellini