On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Stefano,
>
> On 02/14/2017 12:59 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Andre Przywara wrote:
> > > static int its_map_baser(void __iomem *basereg, uint64_t regc, int
> > > nr_items)
> > > @@ -150,6 +191,11 @@ int
Hi Stefano,
On 02/14/2017 12:59 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Andre Przywara wrote:
static int its_map_baser(void __iomem *basereg, uint64_t regc, int nr_items)
@@ -150,6 +191,11 @@ int gicv3_its_init(struct host_its *hw_its)
}
}
+hw_its->cmd_buf =
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Instead of directly manipulating the tables in memory, an ITS driver
> sends commands via a ring buffer to the ITS h/w to create or alter the
> LPI mappings.
> Allocate memory for that buffer and tell the ITS about it to be able
> to send ITS commands.
Hi Andre,
On 30/01/17 18:31, Andre Przywara wrote:
Instead of directly manipulating the tables in memory, an ITS driver
sends commands via a ring buffer to the ITS h/w to create or alter the
LPI mappings.
Allocate memory for that buffer and tell the ITS about it to be able
to send ITS commands.
Instead of directly manipulating the tables in memory, an ITS driver
sends commands via a ring buffer to the ITS h/w to create or alter the
LPI mappings.
Allocate memory for that buffer and tell the ITS about it to be able
to send ITS commands.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara
