Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools/libxc: Introduce XC_CPUPOOL_POOLID_ANY

2017-02-16 Thread Wei Liu
Both patches applied. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools/libxc: Introduce XC_CPUPOOL_POOLID_ANY

2017-02-15 Thread George Dunlap
Callers to xc_cpupool_create() can either request a specific pool id, or request that Xen do it for them. But at the moment, the "automatic" selection is indicated by using a magic value, 0. This is undesirable both because it doesn't obviously have meaning, but also because '0' is a valid

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools/libxc: Introduce XC_CPUPOOL_POOLID_ANY

2017-02-14 Thread Wei Liu
These two patches don't apply anymore. Please rebase. Wei. ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools/libxc: Introduce XC_CPUPOOL_POOLID_ANY

2017-02-09 Thread Wei Liu
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:51:45PM +, George Dunlap wrote: > Callers to xc_cpupool_create() can either request a specific pool id, > or request that Xen do it for them. But at the moment, the > "automatic" selection is indicated by using a magic value, 0. This is > undesirable both because

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools/libxc: Introduce XC_CPUPOOL_POOLID_ANY

2017-02-08 Thread Dario Faggioli
On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 14:51 +, George Dunlap wrote: > Callers to xc_cpupool_create() can either request a specific pool id, > or request that Xen do it for them.  But at the moment, the > "automatic" selection is indicated by using a magic value, 0.  This > is > undesirable both because it

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] tools/libxc: Introduce XC_CPUPOOL_POOLID_ANY

2017-02-08 Thread George Dunlap
Callers to xc_cpupool_create() can either request a specific pool id, or request that Xen do it for them. But at the moment, the "automatic" selection is indicated by using a magic value, 0. This is undesirable both because it doesn't obviously have meaning, but also because '0' is a valid