>>> On 25.06.15 at 03:08, wrote:
> On 06/24/2015 07:49 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 24/06/2015 22:35, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 06/23/2015 11:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_vcpu() after the x86-32 removal.
In a few cases this includes an additi
On 06/24/2015 07:49 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 24/06/2015 22:35, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 06/23/2015 11:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_vcpu() after the x86-32 removal.
In a few cases this includes an additional is_pv_32bit_vcpu() ->
is_pv_32bit_domain() conve
On 24/06/2015 22:35, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 06/23/2015 11:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> ... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_vcpu() after the x86-32 removal.
>>
>> In a few cases this includes an additional is_pv_32bit_vcpu() ->
>> is_pv_32bit_domain() conversion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beul
On 06/23/2015 11:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_vcpu() after the x86-32 removal.
In a few cases this includes an additional is_pv_32bit_vcpu() ->
is_pv_32bit_domain() conversion.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
We have
struct arch_domain
{
...
/* Is a 32-b
On 23/06/15 16:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_vcpu() after the x86-32 removal.
>
> In a few cases this includes an additional is_pv_32bit_vcpu() ->
> is_pv_32bit_domain() conversion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
__
... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_vcpu() after the x86-32 removal.
In a few cases this includes an additional is_pv_32bit_vcpu() ->
is_pv_32bit_domain() conversion.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -1339,7 +1339,7 @@ long
