Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] libxl: fix UUID usage on
FreeBSD"):
> On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 16:11 +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > Yes, we can remove the uuid_t from libxl_uuid, but this is AFAICT a
> > structure that belongs to the stable API.
>
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 16:11 +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> El 15/01/16 a les 11.26, Ian Campbell ha escrit:
> > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 14:14 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > > libxl makes the assumtion that libxl_uuid == uuid_t,
> >
> > ("assumption")
> >
> > > and that uuid_t can be
> > > free
El 15/01/16 a les 11.26, Ian Campbell ha escrit:
> On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 14:14 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> libxl makes the assumtion that libxl_uuid == uuid_t,
>
> ("assumption")
>
>> and that uuid_t can be
>> freely used as a byte array. This is not true on FreeBSD (and NetBSD
>> too, not
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 14:14 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> libxl makes the assumtion that libxl_uuid == uuid_t,
("assumption")
> and that uuid_t can be
> freely used as a byte array. This is not true on FreeBSD (and NetBSD
> too, not sure about other BSD UUID implementations), where the interna
libxl makes the assumtion that libxl_uuid == uuid_t, and that uuid_t can be
freely used as a byte array. This is not true on FreeBSD (and NetBSD
too, not sure about other BSD UUID implementations), where the internals of
uuid don't match what libxl expects as a byte array because of endianness
issu
