On 17/02/17 15:30, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2017 09:19 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 17/02/17 15:05, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/17/2017 02:36 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
When running as pv domain xen_cpuid() is being used instead of
native_cpuid(). In
On 02/17/2017 09:19 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 17/02/17 15:05, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 02/17/2017 02:36 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
When running as pv domain xen_cpuid() is being used instead of
native_cpuid(). In xen_cpuid() the aperf/mperf feature is indicated
as not being present by
On 17/02/17 15:05, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>
> On 02/17/2017 02:36 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> When running as pv domain xen_cpuid() is being used instead of
>> native_cpuid(). In xen_cpuid() the aperf/mperf feature is indicated
>> as not being present by special casing the related cpuid leaf.
On 02/17/2017 02:36 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
When running as pv domain xen_cpuid() is being used instead of
native_cpuid(). In xen_cpuid() the aperf/mperf feature is indicated
as not being present by special casing the related cpuid leaf.
Instead of delivering fake cpuid values clear the cpu
When running as pv domain xen_cpuid() is being used instead of
native_cpuid(). In xen_cpuid() the aperf/mperf feature is indicated
as not being present by special casing the related cpuid leaf.
Instead of delivering fake cpuid values clear the cpu capability bit
for aperf/mperf instead.
