On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 16:19 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_domain() after the x86-32
> removal.
>
> In a few cases this includes no longer open-coding is_pv_32bit_vcpu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Given that the common impact is effectively x86-only due t
On 06/23/2015 04:19 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_domain() after the x86-32
> removal.
>
> In a few cases this includes no longer open-coding is_pv_32bit_vcpu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: George Dunlap
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
> +++ b
On 23/06/15 16:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
> ... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_domain() after the x86-32
> removal.
>
> In a few cases this includes no longer open-coding is_pv_32bit_vcpu().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
___
... as being identical to is_pv_32bit_domain() after the x86-32
removal.
In a few cases this includes no longer open-coding is_pv_32bit_vcpu().
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ int switch_native(struct domain *d)
if (
