On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:06:18PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't.
Could you elaborate on the 'now they don't' please?
Is Xen not doing it? Did it do it in the past?
Is it because the Linux code paths will never run to this in
Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't.
Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 8 ++--
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 7 ---
arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 9 -
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Boris Ostrovsky
wrote:
> Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't.
Fantastic!
--Andy
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
On 11/18/2015 03:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:06:18PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't.
Could you elaborate on the 'now they don't' please?
Is Xen not doing it? Did it do it in the past?
Is it
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:34:32PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/18/2015 03:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:06:18PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >>Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't.
> >Could you elaborate on the 'now they