Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86: irq_enable_sysexit pv op is no longer needed

2015-11-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:06:18PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't. Could you elaborate on the 'now they don't' please? Is Xen not doing it? Did it do it in the past? Is it because the Linux code paths will never run to this in

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86: irq_enable_sysexit pv op is no longer needed

2015-11-18 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't. Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky --- arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 8 ++-- arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 7 --- arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 9 -

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86: irq_enable_sysexit pv op is no longer needed

2015-11-18 Thread Andy Lutomirski
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't. Fantastic! --Andy ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86: irq_enable_sysexit pv op is no longer needed

2015-11-18 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 11/18/2015 03:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:06:18PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't. Could you elaborate on the 'now they don't' please? Is Xen not doing it? Did it do it in the past? Is it

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] x86: irq_enable_sysexit pv op is no longer needed

2015-11-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:34:32PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 11/18/2015 03:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:06:18PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > >>Xen PV guests have been the only ones using it and now they don't. > >Could you elaborate on the 'now they