Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] x86/HVM: unify and fix #UD intercept

2015-12-02 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Jan Beulich > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 1:39 AM > > The SVM and VMX versions really were identical, so instead of fixing > the same issue in two places, fold them at once. The issue fixed is the > missing seg:off -> linear translation of the current code address. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] x86/HVM: unify and fix #UD intercept

2015-11-10 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 10/11/15 17:39, Jan Beulich wrote: > The SVM and VMX versions really were identical, so instead of fixing > the same issue in two places, fold them at once. The issue fixed is the > missing seg:off -> linear translation of the current code address. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/4] x86/HVM: unify and fix #UD intercept

2015-11-10 Thread Jan Beulich
The SVM and VMX versions really were identical, so instead of fixing the same issue in two places, fold them at once. The issue fixed is the missing seg:off -> linear translation of the current code address. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c +++