Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/4] x86/event: correct debug event generation

2015-11-11 Thread Razvan Cojocaru
On 11/11/2015 10:39 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > RIP is not a linear address, and hence should not on its own be subject > to GVA -> GFN translation. Once at it, move all of the (perhaps > expensive) operations in the two functions into their main if()'s body, > and improve the error code passed to

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/4] x86/event: correct debug event generation

2015-11-11 Thread Jan Beulich
RIP is not a linear address, and hence should not on its own be subject to GVA -> GFN translation. Once at it, move all of the (perhaps expensive) operations in the two functions into their main if()'s body, and improve the error code passed to the translation function. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/4] x86/event: correct debug event generation

2015-11-11 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 11/11/15 08:39, Jan Beulich wrote: > RIP is not a linear address, and hence should not on its own be subject > to GVA -> GFN translation. Once at it, move all of the (perhaps > expensive) operations in the two functions into their main if()'s body, > and improve the error code passed to the