Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] x86/hypercall: Merge the hypercall arg tables

2016-08-03 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 03.08.16 at 17:15, wrote: > On 03/08/16 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.07.16 at 11:51, wrote: >>> For the same reason as c/s 33a231e3f "x86/HVM: fold hypercall tables" and >>> (TODO - changeset) "x86/pv: Merge the pv hypercall

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] x86/hypercall: Merge the hypercall arg tables

2016-08-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/08/16 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote: On 18.07.16 at 11:51, wrote: >> For the same reason as c/s 33a231e3f "x86/HVM: fold hypercall tables" and >> (TODO - changeset) "x86/pv: Merge the pv hypercall tables", this removes the >> risk of accidentally updating only one

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] x86/hypercall: Merge the hypercall arg tables

2016-08-03 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 18.07.16 at 11:51, wrote: > For the same reason as c/s 33a231e3f "x86/HVM: fold hypercall tables" and > (TODO - changeset) "x86/pv: Merge the pv hypercall tables", this removes the > risk of accidentally updating only one of the tables. Based on this argument

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] x86/hypercall: Merge the hypercall arg tables

2016-07-18 Thread Andrew Cooper
For the same reason as c/s 33a231e3f "x86/HVM: fold hypercall tables" and (TODO - changeset) "x86/pv: Merge the pv hypercall tables", this removes the risk of accidentally updating only one of the tables. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper --- CC: Jan Beulich