On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 02:52:31PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 11:01 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:21:59PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
with the rest of the file, where we return 1 on 0, rather
than using libxl error codes.
While being
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:23 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:13:33PM +, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:04 +, Wei Liu wrote:
Since we haven't explicitly defined any return value in xl manpage, I
think we should use EXIT_SUCCESS and EXIT_FAILURE per
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 04:22:00PM +, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:23 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:13:33PM +, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:04 +, Wei Liu wrote:
Since we haven't explicitly defined any return value in xl
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 16:24 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 04:22:00PM +, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:23 +, Wei Liu wrote:
I think b) is good.
Right. It was the only comment you made on this patch... does that means
I can stick your
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:04 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 02:52:31PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I think having more consistent exist codes from xl would be nice, but I
don't think the libxl error codes are the ones to use, since they don't
really map semantically onto what
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 03:13:33PM +, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 15:04 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 02:52:31PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
I think having more consistent exist codes from xl would be nice, but I
don't think the libxl error codes are
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 11:01 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:21:59PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
with the rest of the file, where we return 1 on 0, rather
than using libxl error codes.
While being consistent is good I'm not very sure if we should go for 0/1
rather than
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:21:59PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
with the rest of the file, where we return 1 on 0, rather
than using libxl error codes.
While being consistent is good I'm not very sure if we should go for 0/1
rather than libxl error codes. I vaguely remember at some point we
On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 11:01 +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:21:59PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
with the rest of the file, where we return 1 on 0, rather
than using libxl error codes.
While being consistent is good I'm not very sure if we should go for 0/1
rather than
