Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-03-04 Thread Pang, LongtaoX
-Original Message- From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 6:47 PM To: Hu, Robert Cc: Wei Liu; Ian Jackson; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; jfeh...@suse.com; ian.campb...@citrix.com; Pang, LongtaoX Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-17 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:45:34AM +, Hu, Robert wrote: [...] Am I supposed to wait for Wei's patch or use my approach for a while and revert to Wei's patch afterwards? What patch do you expect from me? That Ian mentioned above 'unify the d-i partman-auto/expert_recipe in

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-17 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:37:39AM +, Wei Liu wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:45:34AM +, Hu, Robert wrote: [...] Am I supposed to wait for Wei's patch or use my approach for a while and revert to Wei's patch afterwards? What patch do you expect from me? That Ian

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-17 Thread Ian Jackson
Wei Liu writes (Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install): On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 09:43:33AM +, Hu, Robert wrote: For example, we don't understand the above why some (the first 2) passing params to ts-* with '+' and the latter 2 doesn't? sg-run-job

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-16 Thread Hu, Robert
-Original Message- From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 6:17 PM To: Hu, Robert Cc: Ian Jackson; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; jfeh...@suse.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; ian.campb...@citrix.com; Pang, LongtaoX Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-16 Thread Wei Liu
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 09:43:33AM +, Hu, Robert wrote: -Original Message- From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:03 PM To: Hu, Robert Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; jfeh...@suse.com; wei.l...@citrix.com;

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-15 Thread Hu, Robert
-Original Message- From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:03 PM To: Hu, Robert Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; jfeh...@suse.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; ian.campb...@citrix.com; Pang, LongtaoX Subject: RE: [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Hu, Robert writes (RE: [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install): [Ian] Firstly, can you please reformat your commit message so that the individual points are separated out into paragraphs. But I think actually that probably some of this wants to go into

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Robert Ho writes ([PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install): This patch is to make ts-debian-hvm-install accomodate Ah yes here is the meat. Firstly, can you please reformat your commit message so that the individual points are separated out into paragraphs. But

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-12 Thread Hu, Robert
-Original Message- From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 2:17 AM To: Hu, Robert Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; jfeh...@suse.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; ian.campb...@citrix.com; Pang, LongtaoX Subject: Re: [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on

[Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST 11/12] Changes on test step of debain hvm guest install

2015-02-11 Thread Robert Ho
This patch is to make ts-debian-hvm-install accomodate to nested L1 and L2 guest installation context. 1. Add an input param 'nested' to indicate which installationcontext is. and manipulating 'gn' accordingly. 2. increase disk size to accomodate to nested test requirment. 3. increase