Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2 0/5] Tweaks to allow running non-master production instances

2015-04-17 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 14:47 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Ian Campbell writes (Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v2 0/5] Tweaks to allow running non-master production instances): Since you have now acked everything may I push to the Cambridge branch (once the VM is working again)? Yes. (modulo if you

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2 0/5] Tweaks to allow running non-master production instances

2015-04-15 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 12:33 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Ian Campbell writes ([PATCH OSSTEST v2 0/5] Tweaks to allow running non-master production instances): WRT applying this I think normally we should apply such changes to the upstream production instance and let them filter through, but in

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2 0/5] Tweaks to allow running non-master production instances

2015-04-15 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [PATCH OSSTEST v2 0/5] Tweaks to allow running non-master production instances): Since you have now acked everything may I push to the Cambridge branch (once the VM is working again)? Yes. (modulo if you want me to make the minor change discussed on 1/5 now or not)

[Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2 0/5] Tweaks to allow running non-master production instances

2015-04-15 Thread Ian Campbell
Now that the Cambridge osstest instance is no longer the XenProject master instance it needs some tweaks to allow us to keep using it for local testing. Since v2 I have now tested this in as close to how the osstest user in Cambridge would, but in my own $HOME/testing.git and it appears to do the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH OSSTEST v2 0/5] Tweaks to allow running non-master production instances

2015-04-15 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Campbell writes ([PATCH OSSTEST v2 0/5] Tweaks to allow running non-master production instances): WRT applying this I think normally we should apply such changes to the upstream production instance and let them filter through, but in this case I think it would be better to push my ad-hoc