On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 05:05:29PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 20:56 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
From: Chen Baozi baoz...@gmail.com
Use cpumask_t instead of unsigned long which can only express 64 cpus at
the most. Add the {gicv2|gicv3}_sgir_to_cpumask in corresponding
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 18:21 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
Perhaps we want to bite the bullet now and change the vgic_to_sgi to
take an affinity path thing (aff3.aff2.aff1) + target list, instead of a
cpumask? That makes sense given the 16 CPU per AFF0 limitation, since
there is only a limited
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 20:56 +0800, Chen Baozi wrote:
From: Chen Baozi baoz...@gmail.com
Use cpumask_t instead of unsigned long which can only express 64 cpus at
the most. Add the {gicv2|gicv3}_sgir_to_cpumask in corresponding vGICs
to translate GICD_SGIR/ICC_SGI1R_EL1 to vcpu_mask for
From: Chen Baozi baoz...@gmail.com
Use cpumask_t instead of unsigned long which can only express 64 cpus at
the most. Add the {gicv2|gicv3}_sgir_to_cpumask in corresponding vGICs
to translate GICD_SGIR/ICC_SGI1R_EL1 to vcpu_mask for vgic_to_sgi.
Signed-off-by: Chen Baozi baoz...@gmail.com
---
