On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 09:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 19:00 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On GICv2, the GIC virtual CPU interface is at minimum 8KB. Due some to
> > some necessary quirk for GIC using 64KB stride, we are mapping the
> > region in 2 time.
> > The first
On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 13:28 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 21/09/15 12:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 09:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 19:00 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > On GICv2, the GIC virtual CPU interface is at minimum 8KB.
Hi Ian,
On 21/09/15 12:54, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-18 at 09:53 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 19:00 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On GICv2, the GIC virtual CPU interface is at minimum 8KB. Due some to
>>> some necessary quirk for GIC using 64KB stride, we are
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 19:00 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> On GICv2, the GIC virtual CPU interface is at minimum 8KB. Due some to
> some necessary quirk for GIC using 64KB stride, we are mapping the
> region in 2 time.
> The first mapping is 4KB and the second one is 8KB, i.e 12KB in total.
>
On GICv2, the GIC virtual CPU interface is at minimum 8KB. Due some to
some necessary quirk for GIC using 64KB stride, we are mapping the
region in 2 time.
The first mapping is 4KB and the second one is 8KB, i.e 12KB in total.
Although the minimum supported size (and widely used) is 8KB. This
