El 21/07/15 a les 18.11, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
On 21.07.15 at 17:56, roger@citrix.com wrote:
PSR was using EBADSLT and EUSERS which are not POSIX error codes, replace
them with EINVAL and EOVERFLOW respectively.
Considering that we use EINVAL for almost everything (well beyond
On 21.07.15 at 17:56, roger@citrix.com wrote:
PSR was using EBADSLT and EUSERS which are not POSIX error codes, replace
them with EINVAL and EOVERFLOW respectively.
Considering that we use EINVAL for almost everything (well beyond
parameter checking I'm afraid), I don't think using this
PSR was using EBADSLT and EUSERS which are not POSIX error codes, replace
them with EINVAL and EOVERFLOW respectively.
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné roger@citrix.com
Cc: Ian Jackson ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com
Cc: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
Cc: Ian Campbell