Hi, Jan
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.05.17 at 19:41, wrote:
>> patch #6: As for the current patch, likely the "init" platform
>> callback should be extended with
>> extra "use_iommu" argument as well as the "iommu_domain_init" API. In
>> that case we
>> would ju
>>> On 18.05.17 at 19:41, wrote:
> patch #6: As for the current patch, likely the "init" platform
> callback should be extended with
> extra "use_iommu" argument as well as the "iommu_domain_init" API. In
> that case we
> would just pass thought incoming flag to the IOMMU drivers followed by
> upd
Hi, all.
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.05.17 at 21:52, wrote:
>> On 05/12/2017 03:31 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.05.17 at 16:03, wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
The presence of this flag lets us know that the guest
has devices whi
>>> On 17.05.17 at 21:52, wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 03:31 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.05.17 at 16:03, wrote:
>>> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
>>>
>>> The presence of this flag lets us know that the guest
>>> has devices which will most likely be used for passthrough
>>> and as the result the u
Hi Jan,
On 05/12/2017 03:31 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.05.17 at 16:03, wrote:
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
The presence of this flag lets us know that the guest
has devices which will most likely be used for passthrough
and as the result the use of IOMMU is expected for this domain.
In that
>>> On 12.05.17 at 19:00, wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.05.17 at 16:03, wrote:
>>> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
>>>
>>> The presence of this flag lets us know that the guest
>>> has devices which will most likely be used for passthrough
>>> and as the re
Hi, Jan.
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.05.17 at 16:03, wrote:
>> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
>>
>> The presence of this flag lets us know that the guest
>> has devices which will most likely be used for passthrough
>> and as the result the use of IOMMU is expecte
>>> On 10.05.17 at 16:03, wrote:
> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
>
> The presence of this flag lets us know that the guest
> has devices which will most likely be used for passthrough
> and as the result the use of IOMMU is expected for this domain.
> In that case we have to call iommu_construct(),
From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko
The presence of this flag lets us know that the guest
has devices which will most likely be used for passthrough
and as the result the use of IOMMU is expected for this domain.
In that case we have to call iommu_construct(), actually
what the real assign_device call usu
