>>> On 11.09.17 at 17:52, wrote:
> On Jo, 2017-09-07 at 09:08 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 07.09.17 at 16:26, wrote:
>> > After discussing with Andrew I'm willing to agree with the changes
>> > you do here, with one extra requirement: At least on non-debug
>> > bu
On Jo, 2017-09-07 at 09:08 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 07.09.17 at 16:26, wrote:
> > After discussing with Andrew I'm willing to agree with the changes
> > you do here, with one extra requirement: At least on non-debug
> > builds X86EMUL_UNIMPLEMENTED should always re
>>> On 07.09.17 at 16:26, wrote:
> After discussing with Andrew I'm willing to agree with the changes
> you do here, with one extra requirement: At least on non-debug
> builds X86EMUL_UNIMPLEMENTED should always result in #UD being
> raised by the final consumer of it. It should never, like would
On 06/09/17 14:48, Petre Pircalabu wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> index 64454c7..8a6eb74 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> @@ -2044,6 +2044,7 @@ int hvm_emulate_one_mmio(unsigned long mfn, unsigned
> long
>>> On 06.09.17 at 15:48, wrote:
> Enforce the distinction between an instruction not implemented by the
> emulator and the failure to emulate that instruction by defining a new
> return code, X86EMUL_UNIMPLEMENTED.
>
> This value should only be returned by the core emulator only if it fails to
>
Enforce the distinction between an instruction not implemented by the
emulator and the failure to emulate that instruction by defining a new
return code, X86EMUL_UNIMPLEMENTED.
This value should only be returned by the core emulator only if it fails to
properly decode the current instruction's opc
