Hello Andrew,
On 27/09/2016 17:07, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 28/09/2016 01:01, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Tamas,
On 03/08/2016 11:13, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
The only way a guest may trip with stage 2 access violation is if
mem_access is
or was in-use, so reinjecting these exceptions to the guest
On 28/09/2016 01:01, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Tamas,
>
> On 03/08/2016 11:13, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>> The only way a guest may trip with stage 2 access violation is if
>> mem_access is
>> or was in-use, so reinjecting these exceptions to the guest is never
>> required.
>>
>> Requested-by: Julien
Hi Tamas,
On 03/08/2016 11:13, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
The only way a guest may trip with stage 2 access violation is if mem_access is
or was in-use, so reinjecting these exceptions to the guest is never required.
Requested-by: Julien Grall
Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel
The only way a guest may trip with stage 2 access violation is if mem_access is
or was in-use, so reinjecting these exceptions to the guest is never required.
Requested-by: Julien Grall
Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel
---
Cc: Stefano Stabellini