Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm/mem_access: don't reinject stage 2 access exceptions

2016-09-27 Thread Julien Grall
Hello Andrew, On 27/09/2016 17:07, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 28/09/2016 01:01, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Tamas, On 03/08/2016 11:13, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: The only way a guest may trip with stage 2 access violation is if mem_access is or was in-use, so reinjecting these exceptions to the guest

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm/mem_access: don't reinject stage 2 access exceptions

2016-09-27 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 28/09/2016 01:01, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Tamas, > > On 03/08/2016 11:13, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >> The only way a guest may trip with stage 2 access violation is if >> mem_access is >> or was in-use, so reinjecting these exceptions to the guest is never >> required. >> >> Requested-by: Julien

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm/mem_access: don't reinject stage 2 access exceptions

2016-09-27 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Tamas, On 03/08/2016 11:13, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: The only way a guest may trip with stage 2 access violation is if mem_access is or was in-use, so reinjecting these exceptions to the guest is never required. Requested-by: Julien Grall Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] arm/mem_access: don't reinject stage 2 access exceptions

2016-08-03 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
The only way a guest may trip with stage 2 access violation is if mem_access is or was in-use, so reinjecting these exceptions to the guest is never required. Requested-by: Julien Grall Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel --- Cc: Stefano Stabellini