On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Julien Grall wrote:
> At the moment, most of the callers will have to use mfn_x. However
> follow-up patches will remove some of them by propagating the typesafe a
> bit further.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini
On 09/12/2017 11:03 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> At the moment, most of the callers will have to use mfn_x. However
> follow-up patches will remove some of them by propagating the typesafe a
> bit further.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
mm bits:
Acked-by: George Dunlap
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:03:08AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> At the moment, most of the callers will have to use mfn_x. However
> follow-up patches will remove some of them by propagating the typesafe a
> bit further.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu
>>> On 12.09.17 at 12:03, wrote:
> At the moment, most of the callers will have to use mfn_x. However
> follow-up patches will remove some of them by propagating the typesafe a
> bit further.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
Non-ARM pieces
Acked-by:
At the moment, most of the callers will have to use mfn_x. However
follow-up patches will remove some of them by propagating the typesafe a
bit further.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
Changes in v2:
- Push down a bit some mfn_t to convert some unsigned long local