Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/VPMU: No need to check whether VPMU quirk is needed on Intel

2015-12-03 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/03/2015 01:18 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote: From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 12:50 AM We only support family 6 so quirk handling is always needed. what about you adding other family support in the future then you'll add back below

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/VPMU: No need to check whether VPMU quirk is needed on Intel

2015-12-03 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 11:47 PM > > On 12/03/2015 01:18 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote: > >> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com] > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 12:50 AM > >> > >> We only support family

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/VPMU: No need to check whether VPMU quirk is needed on Intel

2015-12-02 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 12:50 AM > > We only support family 6 so quirk handling is always needed. what about you adding other family support in the future then you'll add back below quirk check? > > Signed-off-by: Boris

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/VPMU: No need to check whether VPMU quirk is needed on Intel

2015-12-01 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
We only support family 6 so quirk handling is always needed. Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky --- xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_intel.c | 18 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/vpmu_intel.c