On 04/05/2016 04:12 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.04.16 at 16:56, wrote:
>> On 04/05/2016 11:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.03.16 at 15:44, wrote:
@@ -541,6 +613,10 @@ static int __init try_platform_timer(struct
platform_timesource *pts)
if ( rc <= 0 )
>>> On 05.04.16 at 16:56, wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 11:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.03.16 at 15:44, wrote:
>>> @@ -541,6 +613,10 @@ static int __init try_platform_timer(struct
>>> platform_timesource *pts)
>>> if ( rc <= 0 )
>>> return rc;
>>>
>>> +/* We have a platform
On 04/05/2016 11:43 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.03.16 at 15:44, wrote:
>> Introduce support for using TSC as platform time which is the highest
>> resolution time and most performant to get (~20 nsecs). Though there
>> are also several problems associated with its usage, and there isn't a
>
>>> On 29.03.16 at 15:44, wrote:
> Introduce support for using TSC as platform time which is the highest
> resolution time and most performant to get (~20 nsecs). Though there
> are also several problems associated with its usage, and there isn't a
> complete (and architecturally defined) guarant
On 04/01/2016 07:45 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:38:18PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
index ed4ed24..2602dda 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
@@ -4
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 07:38:18PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> >> index ed4ed24..2602dda 100644
> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
> >> @@ -432,6 +432,63 @@ uint64_t ns_to_acpi_pm_tick(uint64_t ns)
>
[snip]
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/time.c b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> index ed4ed24..2602dda 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/time.c
>> @@ -432,6 +432,63 @@ uint64_t ns_to_acpi_pm_tick(uint64_t ns)
>> }
>>
>> /
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 02:44:08PM +0100, Joao Martins wrote:
> Introduce support for using TSC as platform time which is the highest
> resolution time and most performant to get (~20 nsecs). Though there
> are also several problems associated with its usage, and there isn't a
> complete (and arch
On 03/29/2016 06:39 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> static void tsc_check_slave(void *unused)
>> @@ -1437,6 +1515,20 @@ static int __init verify_tsc_reliability(void)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +if ( !strcmp(opt_clocksource, "tsc") )
>
> Pls also update xen-command-line.markdown
>
> static void tsc_check_slave(void *unused)
> @@ -1437,6 +1515,20 @@ static int __init verify_tsc_reliability(void)
> }
> }
>
> +if ( !strcmp(opt_clocksource, "tsc") )
Pls also update xen-command-line.markdown
> +{
> +if ( try_platform_timer(&plt_tsc) > 0 )
> +
Introduce support for using TSC as platform time which is the highest
resolution time and most performant to get (~20 nsecs). Though there
are also several problems associated with its usage, and there isn't a
complete (and architecturally defined) guarantee that all machines
will provide reliable
11 matches
Mail list logo
