>>> On 23.03.17 at 18:32, wrote:
> On 20/03/17 13:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.03.17 at 14:36, wrote:
>>> On 20/03/17 08:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
Also I'm still not really happy with the guest_supports_ prefixes
for this and its
On 20/03/17 13:59, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.03.17 at 14:36, wrote:
>> On 20/03/17 08:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Also I'm still not really happy with the guest_supports_ prefixes
>>> for this and its L2 counterpart: The question here isn't whether the
>>> guest
At 16:31 + on 16 Mar (1489681898), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Switch them to returning bool, and taking const parameters.
>
> Rename guest_supports_superpages() to guest_supports_l2_superpages() to
> indicate which level of pagetables it is actually referring to, and rename
>
>>> On 20.03.17 at 14:36, wrote:
> On 20/03/17 08:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Also I'm still not really happy with the guest_supports_ prefixes
>> for this and its L2 counterpart: The question here isn't whether the
>> guest supports it (we can't know whether it does),
On 20/03/17 08:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.03.17 at 17:31, wrote:
>> Switch them to returning bool, and taking const parameters.
>>
>> Rename guest_supports_superpages() to guest_supports_l2_superpages() to
>> indicate which level of pagetables it is actually
>>> On 16.03.17 at 17:31, wrote:
> Switch them to returning bool, and taking const parameters.
>
> Rename guest_supports_superpages() to guest_supports_l2_superpages() to
> indicate which level of pagetables it is actually referring to, and rename
>
Switch them to returning bool, and taking const parameters.
Rename guest_supports_superpages() to guest_supports_l2_superpages() to
indicate which level of pagetables it is actually referring to, and rename
guest_supports_1G_superpages() to guest_supports_l3_superpages() for
consistency.