On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Ian Campbell wrote:
> ... instead of artificially masking the timer interrupt in the timer
> state and relying on the guest to unmask (which it isn't required to
> do per the h/w spec, although Linux does).
>
> By using the newly added hwppi save/restore functionality we make
Hi Ian,
On 10/11/15 16:21, Ian Campbell wrote:
> ... instead of artificially masking the timer interrupt in the timer
> state and relying on the guest to unmask (which it isn't required to
> do per the h/w spec, although Linux does).
>
> By using the newly added hwppi save/restore functionality
... instead of artificially masking the timer interrupt in the timer
state and relying on the guest to unmask (which it isn't required to
do per the h/w spec, although Linux does).
By using the newly added hwppi save/restore functionality we make use
of the GICD I[SC]ACTIVER registers to save and
