>; Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 REPOST 02/12] x86/mm: allow a
> privileged PV domain to map guest mfns
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:05:54AM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Wei Liu [mai
.org; Andrew Cooper
> > <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>; Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>; Wei Liu
> > <wei.l...@citrix.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 REPOST 02/12] x86/mm: allow a
> > privileged PV domain to map guest mfns
> >
> > On Tue,
>; Wei Liu
> <wei.l...@citrix.com>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 REPOST 02/12] x86/mm: allow a
> privileged PV domain to map guest mfns
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 03:50:56PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > In the case where a PV domain is mapping guest resource
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 03:50:56PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> In the case where a PV domain is mapping guest resources then it needs make
> the HYPERVISOR_mmu_update call using DOMID_SELF, rather than the guest
> domid, so that the passed in gmfn values are correctly treated as mfns
> rather
In the case where a PV domain is mapping guest resources then it needs make
the HYPERVISOR_mmu_update call using DOMID_SELF, rather than the guest
domid, so that the passed in gmfn values are correctly treated as mfns
rather than gfns present in the guest p2m.
This patch removes a check which
