On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:51:25PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> On 07/12/15 15:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:21:46PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> Thank you, the changes look good to me. What about patch #2?
> >
> > Oh, I thought you said you wou
Hi Konrad,
On 07/12/15 15:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:21:46PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Thank you, the changes look good to me. What about patch #2?
>
> Oh, I thought you said you would rebase it - so I had been waiting
> for that.
>
> Should have communicat
Hi Konrad,
The rebase of my patch is not correct. It now contains an unused variable and
missing one change.
I will post the rebase of the two patches.
On 01/12/15 18:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> +static unsigned long blkif_ring_get_request(struct blkfront_ring_info *rinfo,
> +
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:21:46PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> On 01/12/15 18:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:55:48PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> Hi Konrad,
> >>
> >> On 01/12/15 15:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 0
Hi Konrad,
On 01/12/15 18:52, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:55:48PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Konrad,
>>
>> On 01/12/15 15:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 06:57:23PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi all,
This is a follow-u
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:55:48PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> On 01/12/15 15:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 06:57:23PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This is a follow-up on the previous discussion [1] related to guest using
> >> 64
Hi Konrad,
On 01/12/15 15:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 06:57:23PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This is a follow-up on the previous discussion [1] related to guest using
>> 64KB
>> page granularity which doesn't boot when the backend isn't using indirec
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 06:57:23PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a follow-up on the previous discussion [1] related to guest using 64KB
> page granularity which doesn't boot when the backend isn't using indirect
> descriptor.
>
> This has been successfully tested on ARM64 with
Hi,
Just noticed that Bob and Konrad have not been correctly CCed.
Regards,
On 18/11/15 18:57, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a follow-up on the previous discussion [1] related to guest using 64KB
> page granularity which doesn't boot when the backend isn't using indirect
> descripto
Hi,
Ping?
Regards,
On 18/11/15 18:57, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a follow-up on the previous discussion [1] related to guest using 64KB
> page granularity which doesn't boot when the backend isn't using indirect
> descriptor.
>
> This has been successfully tested on ARM64 with b
Hi all,
This is a follow-up on the previous discussion [1] related to guest using 64KB
page granularity which doesn't boot when the backend isn't using indirect
descriptor.
This has been successfully tested on ARM64 with both 64KB and 4KB page
granularity guests and QEMU as the backend. Indeed QE
11 matches
Mail list logo