Hi Julien,
On 09/02/2016 12:12 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 02/09/16 10:26, Sergej Proskurin wrote:
>> Hi Julien,
>
> Hello Sergej,
>
>> On 09/01/2016 06:09 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hello Sergej,
>>>
>>> On 16/08/16 23:16, Sergej Proskurin wrote:
This commit moves the altp2m-relate
On 02/09/16 10:26, Sergej Proskurin wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hello Sergej,
On 09/01/2016 06:09 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hello Sergej,
On 16/08/16 23:16, Sergej Proskurin wrote:
This commit moves the altp2m-related code from x86 to ARM. Functions
s/moves/copies/
However, this is not really tru
Hi Julien,
On 09/01/2016 06:09 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello Sergej,
>
> On 16/08/16 23:16, Sergej Proskurin wrote:
>> This commit moves the altp2m-related code from x86 to ARM. Functions
>
> s/moves/copies/
>
> However, this is not really true because the code is current patch is
> not a ver
Hello Sergej,
On 16/08/16 23:16, Sergej Proskurin wrote:
This commit moves the altp2m-related code from x86 to ARM. Functions
s/moves/copies/
However, this is not really true because the code is current patch is
not a verbatim copy.
Lastly, what is the status to have x86 and ARM implementa
This commit moves the altp2m-related code from x86 to ARM. Functions
that are no yet supported notify the caller or print a BUG message
stating their absence.
Also, the struct arch_domain is extended with the altp2m_active
attribute, representing the current altp2m activity configuration of the
do
