On 10/10/17 17:58, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/10/2017 05:56 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 10/10/17 17:20, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> @@ -65,12 +68,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>> #ifdef __AFL_HAVE_MANUAL_CONTROL
>>> __AFL_INIT();
>>>
>>> -while ( __AFL_LOOP(1000) )
>>> +
On 10/10/17 17:20, George Dunlap wrote:
> @@ -65,12 +68,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> #ifdef __AFL_HAVE_MANUAL_CONTROL
> __AFL_INIT();
>
> -while ( __AFL_LOOP(1000) )
> +for( count = 0; __AFL_LOOP(1000); )
> +#else
> +for( count = 0; count < max; count++ )
> #endif
>
On 10/10/2017 05:56 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 10/10/17 17:20, George Dunlap wrote:
>> @@ -65,12 +68,15 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>> #ifdef __AFL_HAVE_MANUAL_CONTROL
>> __AFL_INIT();
>>
>> -while ( __AFL_LOOP(1000) )
>> +for( count = 0; __AFL_LOOP(1000); )
>> +#else
>>
Finding aggregate coverage for a set of test files means running each
afl-generated test case through the harness. At the moment, this is
done by re-executing afl-harness-cov with each input file. When a
large number of test cases have been generated, this can take a
significant amonut of time;
