Hi Andrew,
On 05/12/2017 06:35 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
* Drop __kernel_size_t entirely. It isn't useful distinction, especially as
it means the the prototypes don't appear to match their common definitions.
* Introduce __HAVE_ARCH_* guards for strpbrk(), strsep() and strspn(), which
ma
>>> On 12.05.17 at 19:35, wrote:
> * Drop __kernel_size_t entirely. It isn't useful distinction, especially as
>it means the the prototypes don't appear to match their common definitions.
> * Introduce __HAVE_ARCH_* guards for strpbrk(), strsep() and strspn(), which
>match their impleme
* Drop __kernel_size_t entirely. It isn't useful distinction, especially as
it means the the prototypes don't appear to match their common definitions.
* Introduce __HAVE_ARCH_* guards for strpbrk(), strsep() and strspn(), which
match their implementation in common/string.c
* Apply consis
