On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 04:21:48PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/06/2017, 03:21 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > If the aim of this series is to introduce something that architectures
> > use consistently, then can we please actually poke other architectures
> > about it? e.g. send this to
Hi,
On 10/06/2017, 03:21 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> If the aim of this series is to introduce something that architectures
> use consistently, then can we please actually poke other architectures
> about it? e.g. send this to linux-arch, with a cover letter explaining
> the idea and asking
On 10/06/2017, 04:01 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 6 October 2017 at 13:53, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 10/04/2017, 09:33 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> In arm64, we use ENTRY/ENDPROC for functions with external linkage,
>>> and the bare symbol name/ENDPROC for functions with local
On 6 October 2017 at 13:53, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/04/2017, 09:33 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 4 October 2017 at 08:22, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> On 10/02/2017, 02:48 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 2 October 2017 at 10:12, Jiri Slaby
Hi Jiri,
I can see that these serve a useful purpose (as they are necessary for
asm validation encessary for livepatching), and I am not personally
averse to the new annotations.
However, I am concerned that as-is, this is going to create more
problems for !x86 architectures. More on that below.
Hi,
On 10/04/2017, 09:33 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 4 October 2017 at 08:22, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 10/02/2017, 02:48 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 2 October 2017 at 10:12, Jiri Slaby wrote:
There is a couple of assembly functions, which are invoked
Hello Jiri,
On 4 October 2017 at 08:22, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 10/02/2017, 02:48 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 2 October 2017 at 10:12, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> There is a couple of assembly functions, which are invoked only locally
>>> in the file they are
On 10/02/2017, 02:48 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 2 October 2017 at 10:12, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> There is a couple of assembly functions, which are invoked only locally
>> in the file they are defined. In C, we mark them "static". In assembly,
>> annotate them using
On 2 October 2017 at 10:12, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> There is a couple of assembly functions, which are invoked only locally
> in the file they are defined. In C, we mark them "static". In assembly,
> annotate them using SYM_{FUNC,CODE}_START_LOCAL (and switch their
> ENDPROC to
There is a couple of assembly functions, which are invoked only locally
in the file they are defined. In C, we mark them "static". In assembly,
annotate them using SYM_{FUNC,CODE}_START_LOCAL (and switch their
ENDPROC to SYM_{FUNC,CODE}_END too). Whether FUNC or CODE depends on
ENDPROC/END for a
10 matches
Mail list logo