On 23.01.15 at 09:42, chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Except that MSR_IA32_TSC will looks heterogeneous. But since we already
treat it as a special case, I have no problem here. And if we do so,
even the first patch to add irq_disable ability is not needed. Sounds to
me that the
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 02:09:37PM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.01.15 at 15:03, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 22/01/15 13:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.01.15 at 13:53, chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:20:15AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.01.15 at
On 21.01.15 at 12:19, chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ long cpu_down_helper(void *data);
long core_parking_helper(void *data);
uint32_t get_cur_idle_nums(void);
-#define
On 22/01/15 13:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.01.15 at 13:53, chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:20:15AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.01.15 at 12:19, chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:20:15AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.01.15 at 12:19, chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ long cpu_down_helper(void *data);
long core_parking_helper(void *data);
On 22.01.15 at 13:53, chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:20:15AM +, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.01.15 at 12:19, chao.p.p...@linux.intel.com wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ long
Memory bandwidth monitoring requires system time information returned
along with the monitoring counter to verify the correctness of the
counter value and to calculate the time elapsed between two samplings.
Add MSR_IA32_TSC to the read path and increase
RESOURCE_ACCESS_MAX_ENTRIES to 3.
