>>> On 13.01.15 at 17:45, wrote:
> "Jan Beulich" writes:
>
> On 13.01.15 at 17:17, wrote:
>>> Ian Campbell writes:
An alternative approach to this might be to walk the guest p2m (with
appropriate continuations) and move each domheap page (this would also
help us preserve sup
"Jan Beulich" writes:
On 13.01.15 at 17:17, wrote:
>> Ian Campbell writes:
>>> An alternative approach to this might be to walk the guest p2m (with
>>> appropriate continuations) and move each domheap page (this would also
>>> help us preserve super page mappings). It would also have the a
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 17:17 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 14:45 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> +gmfn = mfn_to_gmfn(d, mfn);
> >
> > (I haven't thought about it super hard, but I'm taking it as given that
> > this approach to kex
>>> On 13.01.15 at 17:17, wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes:
>> An alternative approach to this might be to walk the guest p2m (with
>> appropriate continuations) and move each domheap page (this would also
>> help us preserve super page mappings). It would also have the advantage
>> of not needing ad
Ian Campbell writes:
> On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 14:45 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> +gmfn = mfn_to_gmfn(d, mfn);
>
> (I haven't thought about it super hard, but I'm taking it as given that
> this approach to kexec is going to be needed for ARM too, since that
> seems likely)
>
> mfn_
At 13:53 + on 13 Jan (1421153637), Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 14:45 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > +gmfn = mfn_to_gmfn(d, mfn);
>
> (I haven't thought about it super hard, but I'm taking it as given that
> this approach to kexec is going to be needed for ARM to
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 14:45 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> +gmfn = mfn_to_gmfn(d, mfn);
(I haven't thought about it super hard, but I'm taking it as given that
this approach to kexec is going to be needed for ARM too, since that
seems likely)
mfn_to_gmfn is going to be a bit pricey
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 13:57 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 11.12.14 at 14:45, wrote:
> > --- a/xen/common/domctl.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
> > @@ -1177,6 +1177,39 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)
> > u_domctl)
> > }
> > break;
> >
> > +case XEN_DOMC
>>> On 11.12.14 at 14:45, wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/domctl.c
> +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
> @@ -1177,6 +1177,39 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)
> u_domctl)
> }
> break;
>
> +case XEN_DOMCTL_devour:
> +{
> +struct domain *recipient_dom;
> +
> +
New operation sets the 'recipient' domain which will receive all
memory pages from a particular domain and kills the original domain.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov
---
xen/common/domain.c | 3 +++
xen/common/domctl.c | 33 +
xen/common/page_allo
10 matches
Mail list logo
