On 26/02/15 14:45, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
I would prefer if we avoid to add more compatibles like that in gic.h.
I have a patch to drop a part of this mess. I would advise your to use
cherry-pick the commit [1] in your branch.
[1]
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/julieng/xen-
Hi Frediano,
On 26/02/15 12:40, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index c2dcb49..0834053 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -1038,6 +1038,7 @@ static int handle_node(struct
The GIC in this platform is mainly compatible with the standard
GICv2 beside:
- ITARGET is extended to 16 bit to support 16 CPUs;
- SGI mask is extended to support 16 CPUs;
- maximum supported interrupt is 510.
Use nr_lines to check for maximum irq supported. hip04-d01 support less
interrupts due
Hi Frediano,
On 26/02/15 12:40, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
index c2dcb49..0834053 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
@@ -1038,6 +1038,7 @@ static int handle_node(struct domain *d,
...
/*
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c index
390c8b0..e4512a8 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
@@ -565,12 +565,13 @@ static void do_sgi(struct cpu_user_regs *regs,
enum gic_sgi sgi) void gic_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, int
