On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 11:29 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> I was hoping for an explicit ack from David Woodhouse,
> but I guess the informal "let's not hold this up"
> that was sent on v5 will do.
Apologies; I was working under that assumption too.
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIM
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:48:58PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
> > module option.
>
> Michael, any update on this?
>
> --Andy
I was hoping for an explicit ack from D
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
> module option.
Michael, any update on this?
--Andy
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xe
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
> module option.
>
> This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
> off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
>
> To the Xen people: is this okay? If it
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by
module option.
This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's
off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86.
To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen
variants (PVH? HVM?), can you
