On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:37:39AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> Under COLO, we are doing checkpoint on demand, if this
> callback returns 1, we will take another checkpoint.
So 1 means OK.
> 0 indicates unexpected error.
Why not return an error?
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 03:50:32PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:37:39AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> > Under COLO, we are doing checkpoint on demand, if this
> > callback returns 1, we will take another checkpoint.
>
> So 1 means OK.
>
> > 0 indicates
On 01/27/2016 05:09 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 03:50:32PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:37:39AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>> Under COLO, we are doing checkpoint on demand, if this
>>> callback returns 1, we will take another
On 01/27/2016 04:50 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:37:39AM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> Under COLO, we are doing checkpoint on demand, if this
>> callback returns 1, we will take another checkpoint.
>
> So 1 means OK.
>
>> 0 indicates unexpected error.
>
> Why
Under COLO, we are doing checkpoint on demand, if this
callback returns 1, we will take another checkpoint.
0 indicates unexpected error.
Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang
---
tools/libxc/include/xenguest.h | 18