On 26/05/17 10:10, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
On 22/05/17 18:19, Julien Grall wrote:
On 22/05/17 17:50, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
Hi Andre,
On 17/05/17 16:35, Julien Grall wrote:
+}
+spin_unlock(>arch.vgic.its_devices_lock);
+
+return pirq;
+}
+
+struct pending_irq
Hi,
On 22/05/17 18:19, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 22/05/17 17:50, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi Andre,
>
>> On 17/05/17 16:35, Julien Grall wrote:
+}
+spin_unlock(>arch.vgic.its_devices_lock);
+
+return pirq;
+}
+
+struct pending_irq
On 22/05/17 17:50, Andre Przywara wrote:
Hi,
Hi Andre,
On 17/05/17 16:35, Julien Grall wrote:
+}
+spin_unlock(>arch.vgic.its_devices_lock);
+
+return pirq;
+}
+
+struct pending_irq *gicv3_its_get_event_pending_irq(struct domain *d,
+
Hi,
On 17/05/17 16:35, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 11/05/17 18:53, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> For each device we allocate one struct pending_irq for each virtual
>> event (MSI).
>> Provide a helper function which returns the pointer to the appropriate
>> struct, to be able to find the
Hi Andre,
On 11/05/17 18:53, Andre Przywara wrote:
For each device we allocate one struct pending_irq for each virtual
event (MSI).
Provide a helper function which returns the pointer to the appropriate
struct, to be able to find the right struct when given a virtual
deviceID/eventID pair.
For each device we allocate one struct pending_irq for each virtual
event (MSI).
Provide a helper function which returns the pointer to the appropriate
struct, to be able to find the right struct when given a virtual
deviceID/eventID pair.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara