+1 for this in principle.
I have no further comment to make. :-)
Wei.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 20.12.16 at 01:47, wrote:
> >> > ## Design Phase
> >> >
> >> > The first step toward
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 20.12.16 at 01:47, wrote:
>> > ## Design Phase
>> >
>> > The first step toward acceptance of a new PV protocol is to write a
>> > design
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.12.16 at 01:47, wrote:
> > ## Design Phase
> >
> > The first step toward acceptance of a new PV protocol is to write a
> > design document and send it to xen-devel. It should cover the xenstore
> > handshake mechanism,
>>> On 20.12.16 at 01:47, wrote:
> ## Design Phase
>
> The first step toward acceptance of a new PV protocol is to write a
> design document and send it to xen-devel. It should cover the xenstore
> handshake mechanism, the ABI, how the protocol works and anything else
>
Hi all,
as you know, we have an issue with the speed of review and acceptance of
new PV drivers. In a discussion among committers, George wrote an email
with a short proposal to clarify the development lifecycle of new PV
drivers and the different expectations at each stage of the process. I
took