On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 10:53 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 08:45 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > >
> > > > The commit message doesn't say anything about AHCI. Are AHCI disks
> > > > actually emulated correctly by QEMU with readonly=on?
> > > I just double
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Apologies for only noticing the fix for XSA-142 as it starting flowing to our
> various downstreams. The current fix seems like quite a big hammer IMO. qemu
> doesn't support readonly IDE/SATA disks
>
> # /usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-system-i386
Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Apologies for only noticing the fix for XSA-142 as it starting flowing to our
>> various downstreams. The current fix seems like quite a big hammer IMO. qemu
>> doesn't support readonly IDE/SATA disks
>>
>> #
Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 08:45 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>>
>>> The commit message doesn't say anything about AHCI. Are AHCI disks
>>> actually emulated correctly by QEMU with readonly=on?
>> I just double checked, and good thing since AHCI + readonly is another
>> rejected
>>
On Thu, 2015-11-12 at 08:45 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>
> > The commit message doesn't say anything about AHCI. Are AHCI disks
> > actually emulated correctly by QEMU with readonly=on?
>
> I just double checked, and good thing since AHCI + readonly is another
> rejected
> combination
>
>
Jim Fehlig writes ("Re: [RFC] libxl: relax readonly check introduced by XSA-142
fix"):
> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > I don't think that libxl CODING_STYLE requires brackets for one statement
> > blocks. But I won't enforce it.
Thanks for all the work on this, Jim, and Stefano. It looks good
Hi All,
Apologies for only noticing the fix for XSA-142 as it starting flowing to our
various downstreams. The current fix seems like quite a big hammer IMO. qemu
doesn't support readonly IDE/SATA disks
# /usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-system-i386 -drive
