,"Paul E . McKenney" ,Andrew
Morton ,Christopher Li ,Dou
Liyang ,Masahiro Yamada
,Daniel Borkmann ,Markus
Trippelsdorf ,Peter Foley ,Steven
Rostedt ,Tim Chen ,Ard
Biesheuvel ,Catalin Marinas
,Matthew Wilcox ,Michal Hocko
,Rob Landley ,Jiri Kosina
,"H . J . Lu" ,Paul Bolle
,Baoquan He ,Dan
On 07/19/17 15:47, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:33 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 07/18/17 15:33, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>>> The x86 relocation tool generates a list of 32-bit signed integers. There
>>> was no need to use 64-bit integers because all addresses where above the 2
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:08 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/19/17 15:47, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:33 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> On 07/18/17 15:33, Thomas Garnier wrote:
The x86 relocation tool generates a list of 32-bit signed integers. There
was no need
On 07/18/17 15:33, Thomas Garnier wrote:
> The x86 relocation tool generates a list of 32-bit signed integers. There
> was no need to use 64-bit integers because all addresses where above the 2G
> top of the memory.
>
> This change add a large-reloc option to generate 64-bit unsigned integers.
> I
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 3:33 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/18/17 15:33, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>> The x86 relocation tool generates a list of 32-bit signed integers. There
>> was no need to use 64-bit integers because all addresses where above the 2G
>> top of the memory.
>>
>> This change add
The x86 relocation tool generates a list of 32-bit signed integers. There
was no need to use 64-bit integers because all addresses where above the 2G
top of the memory.
This change add a large-reloc option to generate 64-bit unsigned integers.
It can be used when the kernel plan to go below the to
