Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-06-30 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> 03/28/17 5:55 PM >>> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/numa.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/numa.c > @@ -42,12 +42,27 @@ cpumask_t __read_mostly node_to_cpumask[MAX_NUMNODES]; > > nodemask_t __read_mostly node_online_map = { { [0] = 1UL } }; > > -bool numa_off = 0; > -s8 acpi_numa = 0;

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-05-08 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Vijay, On 02/05/17 10:47, Vijay Kilari wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 25.04.17 at 17:14, wrote: On 25/04/17 15:54, Vijay Kilari wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote: By

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-05-02 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 02.05.17 at 11:47, wrote: > BTW, any review comments on remaining patches? I didn't even manage to get to the start of the flood of RFCs posted during the last 1.5 months (which priority wise all sit behind the various non-RFC postings), so I can't predict when

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-05-02 Thread Vijay Kilari
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 25.04.17 at 17:14, wrote: >> On 25/04/17 15:54, Vijay Kilari wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >>> >>> By setting 1, we are enabling

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-04-25 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 25.04.17 at 17:14, wrote: > On 25/04/17 15:54, Vijay Kilari wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote: >> >> By setting 1, we are enabling acpi_numa by default. If not enabled, the >> below >> call has check

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-04-25 Thread Julien Grall
On 25/04/17 15:54, Vijay Kilari wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote: By setting 1, we are enabling acpi_numa by default. If not enabled, the below call has check srat_disabled() before proceeding fails. My understanding is on x86 acpi_numa is

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-04-25 Thread Vijay Kilari
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > > > On 25/04/17 13:20, Vijay Kilari wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Julien Grall >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Vijay, >>> >>> On 25/04/17 07:54, Vijay Kilari wrote: On Thu,

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-04-25 Thread Julien Grall
On 25/04/17 13:20, Vijay Kilari wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hello Vijay, On 25/04/17 07:54, Vijay Kilari wrote: On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Vijay, On 28/03/17 16:53,

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-04-25 Thread Vijay Kilari
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hello Vijay, > > On 25/04/17 07:54, Vijay Kilari wrote: >> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Julien Grall >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Vijay, >>> >>> On 28/03/17 16:53, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-04-25 Thread Julien Grall
Hello Vijay, On 25/04/17 07:54, Vijay Kilari wrote: On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote: Hi Vijay, On 28/03/17 16:53, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote: From: Vijaya Kumar K Add accessor functions for acpi_numa and numa_off static

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-04-25 Thread Vijay Kilari
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Vijay, > > On 28/03/17 16:53, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> From: Vijaya Kumar K >> >> Add accessor functions for acpi_numa and numa_off static >> variables. Init value of acpi_numa is

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-04-20 Thread Julien Grall
Hi Vijay, On 28/03/17 16:53, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote: From: Vijaya Kumar K Add accessor functions for acpi_numa and numa_off static variables. Init value of acpi_numa is set 1 instead of 0. Please explain why you change the acpi_numa value from 0 to 1. Also, I

[Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 04/25] x86: NUMA: Add accessors for acpi_numa, numa_off and numa_fake variables

2017-03-28 Thread vijay . kilari
From: Vijaya Kumar K Add accessor functions for acpi_numa and numa_off static variables. Init value of acpi_numa is set 1 instead of 0. Also return value of srat_disabled is changed to bool. Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K ---