>>> 03/28/17 5:55 PM >>>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/numa.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/numa.c
> @@ -42,12 +42,27 @@ cpumask_t __read_mostly node_to_cpumask[MAX_NUMNODES];
>
> nodemask_t __read_mostly node_online_map = { { [0] = 1UL } };
>
> -bool numa_off = 0;
> -s8 acpi_numa = 0;
Hi Vijay,
On 02/05/17 10:47, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.04.17 at 17:14, wrote:
On 25/04/17 15:54, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
By
>>> On 02.05.17 at 11:47, wrote:
> BTW, any review comments on remaining patches?
I didn't even manage to get to the start of the flood of RFCs
posted during the last 1.5 months (which priority wise all sit behind
the various non-RFC postings), so I can't predict when
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.04.17 at 17:14, wrote:
>> On 25/04/17 15:54, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> By setting 1, we are enabling
>>> On 25.04.17 at 17:14, wrote:
> On 25/04/17 15:54, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>
>> By setting 1, we are enabling acpi_numa by default. If not enabled, the
>> below
>> call has check
On 25/04/17 15:54, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
By setting 1, we are enabling acpi_numa by default. If not enabled, the
below
call has check srat_disabled() before proceeding fails.
My understanding is on x86 acpi_numa is
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 25/04/17 13:20, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Julien Grall
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Vijay,
>>>
>>> On 25/04/17 07:54, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Thu,
On 25/04/17 13:20, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hello Vijay,
On 25/04/17 07:54, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Julien Grall
wrote:
Hi Vijay,
On 28/03/17 16:53,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello Vijay,
>
> On 25/04/17 07:54, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Julien Grall
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Vijay,
>>>
>>> On 28/03/17 16:53, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Vijay,
On 25/04/17 07:54, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Vijay,
On 28/03/17 16:53, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K
Add accessor functions for acpi_numa and numa_off static
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> On 28/03/17 16:53, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Vijaya Kumar K
>>
>> Add accessor functions for acpi_numa and numa_off static
>> variables. Init value of acpi_numa is
Hi Vijay,
On 28/03/17 16:53, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K
Add accessor functions for acpi_numa and numa_off static
variables. Init value of acpi_numa is set 1 instead of 0.
Please explain why you change the acpi_numa value from 0 to 1.
Also, I
From: Vijaya Kumar K
Add accessor functions for acpi_numa and numa_off static
variables. Init value of acpi_numa is set 1 instead of 0.
Also return value of srat_disabled is changed to bool.
Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K
---
13 matches
Mail list logo