Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 24/25] NUMA: Move CONFIG_NUMA to common Kconfig

Hi Vijay, On 15/06/17 08:52, Vijay Kilari wrote: On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 31.05.17 at 12:18, wrote: On 31/05/17 11:04, Jan Beulich wrote: On 28.03.17 at 17:53, wrote: --- a/xen/common/Kconfig

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 24/25] NUMA: Move CONFIG_NUMA to common Kconfig

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: On 31.05.17 at 12:18, wrote: >> On 31/05/17 11:04, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 28.03.17 at 17:53, wrote: --- a/xen/common/Kconfig +++ b/xen/common/Kconfig @@

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 24/25] NUMA: Move CONFIG_NUMA to common Kconfig

>>> On 31.05.17 at 12:18, wrote: > On 31/05/17 11:04, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 28.03.17 at 17:53, wrote: >>> --- a/xen/common/Kconfig >>> +++ b/xen/common/Kconfig >>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ config HAS_GDBSX >>> config HAS_IOPORTS >>> bool >>> >>>

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 24/25] NUMA: Move CONFIG_NUMA to common Kconfig

Hi Jan, On 31/05/17 11:04, Jan Beulich wrote: On 28.03.17 at 17:53, wrote: --- a/xen/common/Kconfig +++ b/xen/common/Kconfig @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ config HAS_GDBSX config HAS_IOPORTS bool +config NUMA + def_bool y + depends on HAS_PDX What makes

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 24/25] NUMA: Move CONFIG_NUMA to common Kconfig

>>> On 28.03.17 at 17:53, wrote: > --- a/xen/common/Kconfig > +++ b/xen/common/Kconfig > @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ config HAS_GDBSX > config HAS_IOPORTS > bool > > +config NUMA > + def_bool y > + depends on HAS_PDX What makes necessary this dependency? > ---

[Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 24/25] NUMA: Move CONFIG_NUMA to common Kconfig

From: Vijaya Kumar K CONFIG_NUMA is defined in xen/drivers/acpi/Kconfig. Move to common/Kconfig and enabled by default. Also, NUMA feature uses PDX for physical address to memory node mapping. Hence make HAS_PDX dependent for NUMA. Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K