On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 10:10:24AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > Thanks! Can you confirm if any Android or Brillo builds are already using
> > it?
>
> Also more importantly, any chance you can provide any
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> Thanks! Can you confirm if any Android or Brillo builds are already using it?
>
> Also more importantly, any chance you can provide any
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> or it was decided
Sorry I meant to say: 'or _why_ it was decided to not use initramfs on
these systems?'
Luis
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Thanks! Can you confirm if any Android or Brillo builds are already using it?
Also more importantly, any chance you can provide any technical
reasons why initramfs cannot be used, or it was decided to not use it
on
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 11:34:33AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:12:50AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> >> On
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:12:50AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> > This
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 11:34:33AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:12:50AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> > This ports built-in
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:12:50AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > This ports built-in firmware to use linker tables,
>> > this replaces the custom
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:10:24AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 10:12 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > > This ports built-in
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:10:24AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 10:12 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > This ports built-in firmware to use linker tables,
> > > this replaces the custom section solution with
On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 10:12 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > This ports built-in firmware to use linker tables,
> > this replaces the custom section solution with a
> > generic solution.
> >
> > This also demos the use of the .rodata
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:12:50AM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > This ports built-in firmware to use linker tables,
> > this replaces the custom section solution with a
> > generic solution.
> >
> > This also demos the use of the
On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 05:45 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> This ports built-in firmware to use linker tables,
> this replaces the custom section solution with a
> generic solution.
>
> This also demos the use of the .rodata (SECTION_RO)
> linker tables.
>
> Tested with 0 built-in firmware, 1
This ports built-in firmware to use linker tables,
this replaces the custom section solution with a
generic solution.
This also demos the use of the .rodata (SECTION_RO)
linker tables.
Tested with 0 built-in firmware, 1 and 2 built-in
firmwares successfully.
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez
14 matches
Mail list logo