Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-14 Thread Doug McMillan
@devs -- we obviously need to do something about this (too late for 4.5, but for 4.6 + backport). Perhaps there is some alternative systemd construction which disassociates the actual path from the abstract service xenstored dir mounted? I dont think we can do anything about this

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-13 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Jan 13, Doug McMillan wrote: Also quick question if I am understanding my remaining issue [tmpfs: Bad mount option context] as described by a previous thread. Until the code that generates it changes I need to manually change var-lib-xenstored.mount from ... Or am I misunderstanding

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-13 Thread Olaf Hering
On Mon, Jan 12, Ian Campbell wrote: @devs -- we obviously need to do something about this (too late for 4.5, but for 4.6 + backport). Perhaps there is some alternative systemd construction which disassociates the actual path from the abstract service xenstored dir mounted? I dont think we

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-13 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 09:45 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, Ian Campbell wrote: @devs -- we obviously need to do something about this (too late for 4.5, but for 4.6 + backport). Perhaps there is some alternative systemd construction which disassociates the actual path from the

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-13 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Campbell writes (Re: [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux): On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 09:45 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: I dont think we can do anything about this systemd brain damage. Either it gets its Where= from such line within the file, or it gets

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-13 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:11 +, Ian Jackson wrote: Ian Campbell writes (Re: [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux): On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 09:45 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote: I dont think we can do anything about this systemd brain damage. Either it

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-12 Thread Olaf Hering
On Mon, Jan 12, Ian Campbell wrote: Adding some CC's, including the devel list. On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:49 -0600, Doug McMillan wrote: configuration(?) I compiled booted straight from bios with xen.efi during boot I received several errors. xl info works (see attachment). XL list

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-12 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 02:58:53PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: Adding some CC's, including the devel list. On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:49 -0600, Doug McMillan wrote: configuration(?) I compiled booted straight from bios with xen.efi during boot I received several errors. xl info

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-12 Thread Doug McMillan
Depending on which behaviour you are after you should drop either EFI_DIR or EFI_VENDOR from your cfg I think. I think the intention is that people only normally specify EFI_VENDOR. Ian. Ian, Thank you I did not know that. I will add information as comment in PKGBUILD.I had an error in a

Re: [Xen-devel] [Xen-users] [TestDay] minor bug + possible configuration bug 4.5rc4 archlinux

2015-01-12 Thread Olaf Hering
On Mon, Jan 12, Doug McMillan wrote: ./configure \ --localstatedir=/run \ This is wrong for every setup one can think of. It has to be /var. Olaf ___ Xen-devel mailing