Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

Thanks Jianfeng for giving new ideas. There is not much activity on Xen side. Is there someone working on DPDK+Xen? Any news? The technical board requested to re-consider Xen support in DPDK. It will be discussed in the next techboard meeting:

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

.org; Xen-devel > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen > > Ping > > The Xen dom0 support in DPDK seems dead. > > Reminder: > Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not > fixed yet: > http://d

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

Ping The Xen dom0 support in DPDK seems dead. Reminder: Last time we talked about, it was because of a severe bug which is not fixed yet: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044207.html http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044376.html The request (9 months ago) was to

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

2017-02-20 15:33, Joao Martins: > On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > >> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : > Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? > >>> So we do have an

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

On 02/20/2017 09:56 AM, Jan Blunck wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: >>> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : > Is it time now to officially

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

On 02/17/2017 04:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: >> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? >>> So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: >> Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : >> > > Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? >> > So we do have an

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:51:44PM +0100, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : > > > Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? > > So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting > > for review of xen-devel to the spec. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

Le 16/02/2017 à 14:36, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk a écrit : Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? So we do have an prototype implementation of netback but it is waiting for review of xen-devel to the spec. And I believe the implementation does utilize some of the dom0 parts of code in

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:06:18PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> >> Any news about Xen dom0 status in DPDK? >> >> I think there is not enough interest for Xen dom0 in the DPDK community. >> Last time we

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

Le 16/02/2017 à 12:06, Thomas Monjalon a écrit : The request (6 month ago) was to give more time for feedbacks: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-July/044847.html Is it time now to officially remove Dom0 support? yes ___ Xen-devel mailing

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:06:18PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng: > > Hi Thomas and Konrad, > > > > On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: > > >>> As

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

2016-11-11 04:49, Tan, Jianfeng: > Hi Thomas and Konrad, > > On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >> 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: > >>> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to > >>> continue

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

Hi Thomas and Konrad, On 11/11/2016 2:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to continue support for xen in DPDK. And

Re: [Xen-devel] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim responsability for xen

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-11-07 07:38, Jianfeng Tan: >> As some users are still using xen as the hypervisor, I suggest to >> continue support for xen in DPDK. And from 16.11, I will be the >> maintainer of all xen-related files. >> >>