Hi!
> > + The kernel and modules will generate slightly more assembly (1 to
> > 2%
> > + increase on the .text sections). The vmlinux binary will be
> > + significantly smaller due to less relocations.
> >
> > ... but describing a 1-2% kernel text size increase as
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Boris Lukashev wrote:
>
>> Is the expectation then to have security functions also decrease size
>> and operational latency? Seems a bit unrealistic if so.
>> 1-2% performance hit on systems
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017, Boris Lukashev wrote:
> Is the expectation then to have security functions also decrease size
> and operational latency? Seems a bit unrealistic if so.
> 1-2% performance hit on systems which have become at least several
> hundred % faster over recent years is not a
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:09 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Thomas Garnier wrote:
>
>> > > -model=small/medium assume you are on the low 32-bit. It generates
>> > > instructions where the virtual addresses have the high 32-bit to be zero.
>> >
>> > How are
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017, Thomas Garnier wrote:
>
>> Performance/Size impact:
>> Hackbench (50% and 1600% loads):
>> - PIE enabled: 7% to 8% on half load, 10% on heavy load.
>> slab_test (average of 10 runs):
>> - PIE