On 01/23/2017 07:16 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions -
> FAIL"):
>> I'm inclined to increasing the timeout, although this slowness does
>> mean that our tests may be blocked more than we would like.
&g
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions -
FAIL"):
> I'm inclined to increasing the timeout, although this slowness does
> mean that our tests may be blocked more than we would like.
I have set the host property which I think will c
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions -
FAIL"):
> I would not be surprised that it takes 2.5 hours for a make allmodules
> on both the Cubietruck and Arndale.
...
> So I can see 2 solutions:
> 1) Increase the timeout
>
>
> So I can see 2 solutions:
> 1) Increase the timeout
> 2) Only build the kernel on the Arndales. Though they are known to
> be unreliable in the colo :/
>
> Any opinions?
I'd vote for (1). Alternatively we could cross-compile on an x86 box.
-boris
Hi,
On 19/01/2017 20:15, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
So this appears to be a pretty slow, 2-core box:
[ 0.049778] SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (96.00 BogoMIPS).
For comparison, my (old-ish) phone is 4 x 26 BogoMIPS. So it's
theoretically faster than this server.
The ARM32 platforms we
> So this appears to be a pretty slow, 2-core box:
>
> [ 0.049778] SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (96.00 BogoMIPS).
For comparison, my (old-ish) phone is 4 x 26 BogoMIPS. So it's
theoretically faster than this server.
-boris
>
> Julien --- how does 2.5 hours for kernel build sound to
On 01/19/2017 01:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237:
> regressions - FAIL"):
>> On 01/18/2017 10:05 AM, osstest service owner wrote:
>>> build-armhf-pvops 5 kernel-build fail RE
Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions
- FAIL"):
> On 01/18/2017 10:05 AM, osstest service owner wrote:
> > build-armhf-pvops 5 kernel-build fail REGR. vs.
> > 59254
>
> ARM build seems to be c
On 01/18/2017 10:05 AM, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 104237 linux-linus real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104237/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>
flight 104237 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/104237/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 59254
10 matches
Mail list logo
