Hi,
On 02/06/2015 06:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.05.15 at 18:32, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 17:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Looking at the netback side though it seems like netback_remove is
switching to state=Closed _before_ it calls kobject_uevent(...,
On 29.05.15 at 18:32, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 17:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Looking at the netback side though it seems like netback_remove is
switching to state=Closed _before_ it calls kobject_uevent(...,
KOBJ_OFFLINE) and it is this which generates the call
On 28/05/15 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.05.15 at 11:26, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.05.15 at 18:04, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I've now managed to reproduce using the
On 29.05.15 at 11:56, andrew.coop...@citrix.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.05.15 at 11:26, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.05.15 at 18:04, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 10:56 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 28/05/15 11:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.05.15 at 11:26, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.05.15 at 18:04, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100,
On Wed, 2015-05-27 at 17:04 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
Looking at the netback side though it seems like netback_remove is
switching to state=Closed _before_ it calls kobject_uevent(...,
KOBJ_OFFLINE) and it is this which generates the call to netback_uevent
which tries and fails to read script
On 27.05.15 at 18:04, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:56 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.05.15 at 18:04, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:56 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
On 28.05.15 at 11:26, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 27.05.15 at 18:04, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
I've now managed to reproduce using the arndale on my desk.
... and
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 14:29 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:56 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
Regressions :-(
Hi,
On 20/05/2015 11:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 11:11 +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 20/05/2015 11:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
Regressions :-(
Tests
Hi Ian,
On 26/05/2015 11:17, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 11:11 +0200, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 20/05/2015 11:56, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 10:56 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 17 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 56375
Regressions which
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 09:34 +, osstest service user wrote:
flight 56759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/56759/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
16 matches
Mail list logo