Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 62646: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2015-10-07 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:31 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 18:21 +, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 62646 xen-unstable real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62646/ > > > > Failures :-/ but no regressions. > > > > Regressions which are reg

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 62646: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2015-10-06 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-10-05 at 18:21 +, osstest service owner wrote: > flight 62646 xen-unstable real [real] > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62646/ > > Failures :-/ but no regressions. > > Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): > test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdo

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 62646: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2015-10-05 Thread osstest service owner
flight 62646 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62646/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 6 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 62583 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stub